Mike Stark, who hopes to become a lawyer, holding a sign displaying his deep thinking
Name: W. Michael Stark, aka Mike Stark
Occupation: Student, political clown, self-described "citizen journalist," talk radio wannabe
Best known for: Stalking Sen. George Allen; befriending an anonymous computer-phile named after a Star Trek character; working for the bankrupt Air America radio network
Characteristics: Twisting the truth; sexist language; guerilla politics; whining; cursing like a rabid leftist using medical marijuana
Quotes: "
A couple of $100 million dollar lawsuits might open up a discovery process that would lead to finding out who, exactly, ordered the f...ing garbage that allows these police state tactics to go on ."
"
If that isn't a clear-cut case of prosecutorial abuse, WHAT THE F... IS? Are they going to get away with it? "
A couple weeks ago, W. Michael Stark appeared on CNN's "Reliable Sources," as a representative of leftist bloggers. Stark fancies himself as a "citizen journalist," so he must have been tickled to get a seat on a legitimate show discussing real journalism.
As a professional journalist for almost 20 years, Stark's appearance sickened me. This guy's ethics couldn't get him a gig writing press releases for Osama bin Laden and here he was on a national show allegedly about legitimate journalism. Either the host had a slow news day, or my profession has slipped into a cesspool of anemic credibility from which it may never recover.
Luckily, Stark was on his best behavior during the appearance and washed out his potty mouth that he regularly displays on radical blogs such as DailyKos. For example, he wrote one ditty titled, "By the F***ing Way take these RNC F***ers down."
I'm no prude and can curse with the best of them. But I separate my sometimes-bawdy language from my writing, though so-called men like Stark test my will power.
I chose Stark as my debut subject for The Cat Call because he is what is wrong with politics. He has all of the attributes of gutter-gang wannabe political players who turn Americans away on Election Day. And he is liberal - a perfect messiah for the socialist bunch who hate America because it is strong, rich, righteous and right.
Stark, by his very appearance on Reliable Sources, represents the dreams of Joe and Jane Liberal. It gives a pittance of credibility to Stark and the left who specialize in insurgent tactics that are weak on facts. They deserve no such recognition. There are credible liberal bloggers who could have filled Stark's seat.
Stark represents the worst in human behavior and blogging. During his debate on Reliable Sources, Stark used specious arguments to defend his buddy, an anonymous Star Trek-obsessed blogger, Spocko, who used out-of-context quotes from KSFO radio talent in an effort to turn away advertisers and, thus, squelch the 1st Amendment Rights of the radio personalities. This is a classic liberal move: The rights under the Constitution only apply to them, no matter how much they lie, cheat, distort, attack and offend others' rights.
So who is this guy? Well, I've done lots of research and it should make Howard Kurtz blush that he ever gave this guy airtime. I contacted CNN for a comment on Stark's appearance from Kurtz. Despite Kurtz's admonishment of KSFO and ABC for not responding to him for comment on Spocko-gate, he failed to answer my written questions or contact me for comment on this article.
"You two continue this off the air. I want to give you my take, which is, I don't like boycotts, but, you know, tough luck. It's fair game when you're in the media business for critics to talk about what's on your air," Kurtz told Stark and Dan Riehl, a more conservative blogger who countered Stark's arguments. " And ABC Radio should not be saying no comment. ABC is in the communications business. They ought to have some kind of comment about what they did."
The transcript of Stark's appearance can be found here:
For the record, my research comes from public records that are easily accessed by anybody who cares. And we all should care because Stark and his type are poisoning our society with their brand of hate and twisted politics. Through their hijinks on the Internet and backing from sugar daddies such as billionaire left-winger George Soros, the Starks of the world are taking ground from more traditional and rational Democrats, such as Sen. Joe Lieberman, who in 2000 was the Democrats choice for vice president. While their voices should be heard like every other legal American - and bloggers are an important piece of the political puzzle - the Stark-ites should not control the political process with their hate-spewing rhetoric that comes from the hottest corners of hell. Yet that is their intent.
It is clear from their blogging and actions that Stark and others want to mute the conservative voice. Spocko took snippets of KSFO radio commentary out of context then sent it to KSFO advertisers to silence Melanie Morgan, Lee Rodgers and Brian Sussman. Stark piled on and made sure that the comments were spread around the blogosphere, but denied he wanted to infringe on the radio talents' First Amendment rights. Well, what else do you want to call it? A radio business can't survive without advertising dollars, as liberal Air America - for which Stark has worked - well knows. It's kind of like saying that an abortion doesn't end a life. No advertising, no radio show, no conservative voice on KSFO.
Included in Spocko's snippets was a piece that accused KSFO's Officer Vic of using a curse word (the s-word) while introducing an advertisement. But listening to the entire quote, it is clear that Spocko either misunderstood the words or flat-out lied. Even if somebody had used "sh.t" on the air, would this really offend the senses of Stark and his buddies? Stark's blog is littered with foul words and phrases, as are many blogs. It's almost as if Stark uses Hustler magazine for a dictionary. Stark's tenure as a blogger is miniscule when compared to the time Lee Rodgers, Melanie Morgan and Officer Vic have had their show. Yet Stark outpaces the rank-language scale like Tiger Woods whips any comers.
The danger of Spocko-gate is that Stark and others who participated in the attack of the First Amendment got national media attention for their behavior. KSFO is a conservative radio voice in the liberal-dominated media of the Bay Area, which is likely the reason Spocko and his buddy Stark went after them. Without KSFO, the airwaves in San Francisco are void of conservative comment. Perhaps this is a test case for other markets. If Stark and others can take down their Goliath, they can move on to other markets and replicate the Spocko-scheme.
Good girl, bad woman
Stark's free speech triangulation - a trait that does not exist with true journalists and even citizen journalists - allows him to differentiate between his hate speech - which he excuses as a personality flaw that comes with being a prince in the dark corners of the blogosphere.
Stark gets his kicks by calling women names, stalking political opponents,
cursing, bragging and calling nationally syndicated conservative radio talk shows.
He reserves his misogyny for conservative women such as talk show host Tammy Bruce, a Democrat who doesn't march in lockstep with Stark's so-called "progressive" ilk. He called her a "two-bit whore". Liberal women such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-San Francisco, do not draw Stark's wrath. It seems they can do no wrong as long as they're paddling in his boat.
When a blogger scolded Stark for calling Bruce names, he used his favorite defense: I'm a former Marine.
"mike, you should be better than that "2 bit whore" comment, unless you actually know the woman's sexual activities (only thing i read is that she is gay). shouldn't stoop to derogatory sexist name calling just cause of her actions. you are trying to expose her inadequecies, (sic) not your own."
Stark did not repent
"I was speaking in my capacity as a Marine... we have an instinctive capacity for sensing these things. More seriously, I'm a blogger - with a personality and all the credits and debits that come with it. I think this woman is a big ol' festering sore on humanity. Alternatively, I could call her a two-bit whore..." (though a legit argument could be made that I'm insulting two-bit whores - and for that i'd be genuinely sorry)
Underdog or overpaid?
The controversy over the leftist bloggers, Spocko, and KSFO, revved the leftwing blogosphere, with Stark leading the rabid pack. Bloggers and Stark tried to twist their attempts at violating others First Amendment rights by painting a picture of a David and Goliath fight.
Stark and others feigned innocence - "oh my virgin ears" - and said KSFO's broadcasts were offensive. Meanwhile, Stark's own blog posts snuff talk.
Piling on like thugs, a blogger on Stark's site viciously announces that Bruce's friends want her killed, then makes a homophobic reference to Bruce, who is lesbian. Stark didn't see fit to edit the hateful language.
"its (sic) rather sad...she no longer has her old friends and those she thinks of as friends would love to see her burned at the stake as a dyke."
Yet Stark played the innocent boy on the block, playing up to Kurtz's offering that a big bad corporation was trying to silence the choir boy bloggers.
"Is this, the way ABC and the parent company reacted, is this a big corporation trying to intimidate bloggers?" Kurtz asked Stark during his Jan. 21, 2007, appearance.
"Oh, it's absolutely a big corporation trying to intimidate bloggers," Stark replied.
Don't cry for Stark, Spocko and the other little bloggers who fight dirty in "blogswarms" that are like a gang of thugs kicking a kid on a playground. Big-money liberals who like the gang warfare are paying the way for anointed bloggers, such as Stark.
This week Stark announced that he will hand out thousands of dollars to "progressive" bloggers as the new money man for BlogPac.com. Stark announced his new job in a blog entry entitled, "My new job kicks a**."
The gist of his position, director of activism, will be handing out cash to leftist bloggers who meet his criteria, whatever that is. I can imagine the questions for applicants, "So how many conservatives have you heckled lately? Can you cuss like Satan's son?"
Stark says he'll ask for suggestions of others when he hands out the monthly cash of $1,750. But it isn't so much the amount of money or even Stark's power over it that's a problem. He is hooked up with big-name liberal activists, such as Chris Bowers who claims netroot organizations donated $300 million to liberal politicians in the 2003-04-election cycle. This amount was one-third of the money that went to Democratic campaign consultants that year, Bowers wrote in a DailyKos blog, Jan. 25.
The moral of this story is that middle America and conservatives cannot ignore Stark, Spocko, and others who seek fame and power by undermining legitimate conservative voices. Stark and his ilk have the money and backing of more credible folks who will use them to do the dirty work of leftist Democrats. That is the danger of Mike Stark's Blogos-Fear.