Liberal Hypocrisy and Michael Vick |
![]() |
![]() |
Written by Melanie Morgan | |
Tuesday, 31 July 2007 | |
"[t]he Michael Vick dogfighting case made its way to the floor of the U.S. Senate Thursday when its most senior member publicly declared his outrage, saying he's witnessed one execution but wouldn't mind seeing another 'if it involves this cruel, sadistic, cannibalistic business of training innocent, vulnerable creatures to kill.' Don't you like the way the liberals think? Death penalty for Vick for misusing dogs. Shame on me for proposing the death penalty for someone who gave America's secrets to our enemy. I think I like Byrd's language, i.e. "The New York Times, by revealing America's secrets, had empowered against our troops an enemy that is cruel, sadistic, cannibalistic ... for training innocent, vulnerable creatures [Muslims] to kill. My sentiments exactly! Same sort of thinking that gets liberals to agree that it is ok to use taxpayer money to fund art that includes a crucifix in urine, but it is a felony to toss a Quran in the toilet. Many of these people had to get a postgraduate degree to figure all of this out. |
< Prev | Next > |
---|