"[t]he Michael Vick dogfighting case made its way to the floor of the U.S. Senate Thursday when its most senior member publicly declared his outrage, saying he's witnessed one execution but wouldn't mind seeing another 'if it involves this cruel, sadistic, cannibalistic business of training innocent, vulnerable creatures to kill.'
"The strong words from Sen. Robert Byrd, D-WV, widely known for his devotion to animals, come as dogfighting controversy swirls around the Atlanta Falcons star quarterback. Vick and three others were indicted earlier this week on felony charges of competitive dogfighting, procuring and training pit bulls for fighting, and conducting the enterprise across state lines
Don't you like the way the liberals think? Death penalty for Vick for misusing dogs. Shame on me for proposing the death penalty for someone who gave America's secrets to our enemy. I think I like Byrd's language, i.e. "The New York Times, by revealing America's secrets, had empowered against our troops an enemy that is cruel, sadistic, cannibalistic ... for training innocent, vulnerable creatures [Muslims] to kill. My sentiments exactly!
Same sort of thinking that gets liberals to agree that it is ok to use taxpayer money to fund art that includes a crucifix in urine, but it is a felony to toss a Quran in the toilet. Many of these people had to get a postgraduate degree to figure all of this out.